How we will consider changes
To ensure that all changes are consistently and throughly reviewed, we have implemented a consistent process for all suggestions.
1. Query/suggestion raised. Query or suggestion about the passport content is brought to a marker or assessor.
2. Complete suggestion form. Marker or assessor completes the form below outlining query/suggestion.
3. SME review. Compassly send all relevant queries/suggestions to the project Subject Matter Expert (SME).
4. Stakeholder engagement. The project SME produces potential changes based on the suggestion and sends to the stakeholder group giving a deadline for response
5. Suggested changes. The project SME compiles suggested changes to the content in a powerpoint presentation
6. Present at SACT Members Interest Group (MIG). Changes are presented at the SACT MIG and will be either approved for inclusion in the passport - or postponed / rejected with a reason
Once changes are accepted, the overall approach is to:
• Publish minor changes on an ongoing basis - e.g. updates to references, tweaks to the wording of questions, typos etc.•
• Publish more significant changes on a batched, periodic basis - e.g. changes to sections, any additional questions or content
This is to balance the need to make the latest material available against not confusing people with unexpected major changes.
